Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"We got to do a better job of reaching our fans," Massaro said. "We got to make the games more fun to attend and we got several ideas we're trying to queue up this year."
yawn
This news is the Gettysburg of the 1-A experiment and the coach and AD have completely ran the ship. Into an iceberg.
I think anything they do at this point is rearranging deck chairs.
Murfreesboro is a terrible college town.
Who pulls the plug on McPhee?
Our new board? Although, they have been kind of disappointing thus far as they and McPhee were powerless with the whole law school fiasco.
These people just don't understand the concept of breathing new life into a program. Sometimes you just need a new president, athletic director, and coach literally for the sake of change.
It's bad enough they could all be fired for lack of production, it's even worse when you see everything going down the drain and nobody's even making an effort to turnover the administration.
This is why government control of things doesn't work. There is no accountability. If this were a free-market capitalist company where McPhee, Massaro, and Stock had to answer to shareholders and be accountable to the health of the organization, they would have been fired a long, long time ago.
Sad, sad, sad.
Going off an aging, foggy memory, but this is what I remember. There were 4 published finalists: CM, a guy from UT, someone from a small college in Connecticut, & someone from Arizona St. The guy from UT withdrew after a tour of the campus & town. My guess is the school wanted someone with some familiarity or ties to the South. CM probably ended up being the default candidate. I remember thinking at the time I was somewhat underwhelmed by the 4 candidates.Several years ago I tried to dig up some articles from the time around when we made a change in ADs. Never could find on line the articles I was looking for. I seem to remember attendance and ticket sales were a big issue in selecting an AD and here we are 14 years later...
Not sure I see the correlation between BRAA donations and leadership ineptitude.
People want to feel good about giving their hard earned money away. I don’t get that feeling with the stewardship at hand.
Exactly. I have stopped giving to the BRAA and no longer buy season tickets. I will not give again until some changes have been made. I'm certain i'm not the only one. Why give money to this group so they can piss it away? It's the only way I can see to exert some pressure for change.
This is beyond embarrassing....
Exactly. I have stopped giving to the BRAA and no longer buy season tickets. I will not give again until some changes have been made. I'm certain i'm not the only one. Why give money to this group so they can piss it away? It's the only way I can see to exert some pressure for change.
Good point.Yet you were the one complaining about how good Troy's facilities were compared to ours. Fine if you don't want to give...but then why complain about lack of facilities when we know $$$ are the key.
I think it's very obvious from the season ticket and attendence count few care. At this point it's not a question of how much you give its do you give. I have until this year. I have had enough of this piss poor management and will not give a dime until the whole bunch are gone. If this were a private company we would be bankrupt, so call leaders fired years ago and probably indictments. If the numbers published here are not enough to get people fired then there is no hope. And if it doesn't change I'll just keep more of my hard earned money.Wonder how many complaining about attendance have season tickets or actually show up for games? Kind of like people complaining about facilities...my question is how much have you given to BRAA to help out?
Good point.
At what point should fans, boosters, supporters start speaking with their wallets? At what point can they legitimately complain about a poor ROI? Does their lack of financial support indicate a lack of trust in the ability of the leadership to guide the program to a brighter future?
These are simple questions, but they have complicated answers. It’s a chicken / egg scenario. Do facilities come because of program success or does program success come because of fascilities? Or is it a bit of both?
It works very well in the private sector. Takes a bit more time in public sector due to no accountability, desire for pensions over performance and low expectations.So one thought process is stop giving money and leadership will change? How has that worked? Do not see how the same people that stop giving money and stop buying season tickets complain about facilities and attendance. Facilities are built with money.
Yet you were the one complaining about how good Troy's facilities were compared to ours. Fine if you don't want to give...but then why complain about lack of facilities when we know $$$ are the key.