Buster leaving after 5 years in what's at best a lateral move is troubling me. Though I'm not unhappy with his departure, the trend of OC departure's since Stockstill arrived has been a reoccurring theme. Tony Franklin, G.A. Mangus, and Buster Faulkner all left for more or less a lateral job (Franklin was a slight step up going to L.A. Tech, but remember we had just won 10 games and had Dasher coming back, so it was a very surprising move at the time all things considered).
A comment made by Buster in his recent interview with an Arkansas State paper really triggered me to write this post and talk about this concern...
"
Q. How do you feel about being a coordinator when the head coach's background is on the same side of the ball as you? (This was in regard to his new boss Blake Anderson being a long-time offensive coordinator)
A. [Middle Tennessee Coach Rick Stockstill] was an offensive-minded guy and he was around a lot. "
"He was around a lot" aka he was meddling in Buster's game plans. After five years on the job you would think Buster wouldn't need (or want) to be micromanaged? We all know Tony Franklin and Stock didn't get along and I'd say it's pretty likely due to the fact that Stock wanted to meddle with his play calling and game plans and Tony Franklin obviously didn't need or want any of his help. Maybe if he had stayed out of Franklin's business and let him do his job (that he was so very good at) he would have stayed longer....
I find these things very troubling because we all know Stockstill (who earned the name Stuckstill while OC at ECU) doesn't have the mind of a Tom Herman or Jimbo Fisher. At this point, I have no doubt that he has a reputation amongst the coaching circles for being a micro-manager and meddling in offensive game plans. Hell, I've heard two former coaches explicitly say that "He's very difficult to work for" (They're coincidentally no longer here either....Watts & Danny Lewis). These things are going to make it difficult, in my opinion, to make a home-run hire.
And even if we were to make a home-run hire, who's to say he wouldn't be meddling with the new OC too?
Please, stop with the micro-managing Rick.
A comment made by Buster in his recent interview with an Arkansas State paper really triggered me to write this post and talk about this concern...
"
Q. How do you feel about being a coordinator when the head coach's background is on the same side of the ball as you? (This was in regard to his new boss Blake Anderson being a long-time offensive coordinator)
A. [Middle Tennessee Coach Rick Stockstill] was an offensive-minded guy and he was around a lot. "
"He was around a lot" aka he was meddling in Buster's game plans. After five years on the job you would think Buster wouldn't need (or want) to be micromanaged? We all know Tony Franklin and Stock didn't get along and I'd say it's pretty likely due to the fact that Stock wanted to meddle with his play calling and game plans and Tony Franklin obviously didn't need or want any of his help. Maybe if he had stayed out of Franklin's business and let him do his job (that he was so very good at) he would have stayed longer....
I find these things very troubling because we all know Stockstill (who earned the name Stuckstill while OC at ECU) doesn't have the mind of a Tom Herman or Jimbo Fisher. At this point, I have no doubt that he has a reputation amongst the coaching circles for being a micro-manager and meddling in offensive game plans. Hell, I've heard two former coaches explicitly say that "He's very difficult to work for" (They're coincidentally no longer here either....Watts & Danny Lewis). These things are going to make it difficult, in my opinion, to make a home-run hire.
And even if we were to make a home-run hire, who's to say he wouldn't be meddling with the new OC too?
Please, stop with the micro-managing Rick.