That's also an unfair statement. College football added a 12th game starting in 2006 which made it a lot easier to get to a "10 win season" - With the added 12th game + the accessibility of bowl games, getting 10 wins is not what it used to be.
McCollum's 8 win season very likely would have ended as a "10 win season" if bowl games were as accessible then and we also played 12 games then.
You've gotta look at the big picture here and be very careful when you start comparing the past and present. When you factor in everything, Stockstill has honestly not done much more for our program than McCollum. Stockstill has a slightly higher winning %, but you've gotta remember McCollum played a murders row schedule year in, year out.
For me it's all about the eye test. And Stockstill's teams just don't look any better than what McCollum put on the field. McCollum's teams had talent, but frequently played down to the competition and lost games they shouldn't have. Stockstill's teams seem to flat out lack talent which is difficult to overcome.
Also, ask yourself this. Do you think an Andy McCollum Middle Tennessee led team would get SHELLACKED by Vanderbilt, in back 2 back years, by a combined score of 63-13 ????? There is no way in frozen hell that would have ever happened under McCollum's watch.