I don't have to admit to jack-diddly-do. He walked into a pretty doggone good situation of inheriting a program that had just hit the Top 25, had recent big success in the NCAA Tourney, typically had home games with 6,000 to 7,000 fans and in the games at end of conference play had over 10,000 fans in the arena on national TV. He had an admin that was paying him well for a mid-major considering his previous experience and level of experience, and the same admin that would apparently place little to no expectations or pressure to perform. I imagine it was (or is) likely a dream for a D1 HC to have an admin not constantly breathing down your neck to highly perform and succeed. Additionally, the program still had a lot of positive sports media attention and the attention and recognition from highly rated recruits.
The big drawback or challenge in all of this was basically having to rebuild a depleted if not nearly empty roster. Something to which new coaches have to deal with constantly throughout college basketball. Many of those programs would still expect the new coach to produce a roster, a team, that would still contend for their conference and post season success. Not so at MT. Most wanted to see a competitive generally winning (.500) team that was showing signs of improving for bigger and better things in years 2 and 3. Pretty doggone reasonable in this day and age of D1 college basketball.
I'm not sure if you are wanting people to confess for some perceived wrong for expecting something better than last in the conference and at the bottom of national ratings for all of D1 basketball, or if you are trolling, or just smoking too much wacky weed?