As with most posters I am concerned about MT's place in the mid-state's athletic world.
Attendance, media coverage, fan support throughout the mid-state (at seen by yard signs, flags, and vehicle gear in the area), ability to sign a larger share of the better prospects from the area: All of this is not where I expected or hoped for when the move to D-1 in FB was announced.
I've been listening to local (mostly Nashville) sports talk this week and while the game is mentioned (primarily by outlets with contractual agreements with MT) I haven't heard any in-depth analysis (except for Monte's show), much mention of any MT players other than young Stock, and none of the several handicappers I heard mentioned the game. Even when playing the area's SEC team we are irrelevant and almost invisible. One would like to think that when two area D-1 schools are playing that would be the topic de jour for the week. Instead Mariotta, UT-K's program, the upcoming Pred. season; Anything but MT/VU
Fifteen +/- years ago on one of the sports talk shows I heard a discussion of how the upcoming 3 game series played out would have an effect upon the programs. The newcomers to the mid-state, many of whom were looking for a local team to support, would watch the series to determine which school to support. If MT could be competitive, it was proposed, many of the alumni would jump on board along with casual fans who were looking for a team. MT was more than competitive winning all three games yet I bet we would be hard presses to find anyone who, because of our play against VU, became a hard-core MT fan and is still on board today.
My question to you MT fans (I won't care if a rational VU lurker weighs in): What is the relevance of this series to the future of MT athletics? Does the attendance throughout the series matter? Does the record matter?
Attendance, media coverage, fan support throughout the mid-state (at seen by yard signs, flags, and vehicle gear in the area), ability to sign a larger share of the better prospects from the area: All of this is not where I expected or hoped for when the move to D-1 in FB was announced.
I've been listening to local (mostly Nashville) sports talk this week and while the game is mentioned (primarily by outlets with contractual agreements with MT) I haven't heard any in-depth analysis (except for Monte's show), much mention of any MT players other than young Stock, and none of the several handicappers I heard mentioned the game. Even when playing the area's SEC team we are irrelevant and almost invisible. One would like to think that when two area D-1 schools are playing that would be the topic de jour for the week. Instead Mariotta, UT-K's program, the upcoming Pred. season; Anything but MT/VU
Fifteen +/- years ago on one of the sports talk shows I heard a discussion of how the upcoming 3 game series played out would have an effect upon the programs. The newcomers to the mid-state, many of whom were looking for a local team to support, would watch the series to determine which school to support. If MT could be competitive, it was proposed, many of the alumni would jump on board along with casual fans who were looking for a team. MT was more than competitive winning all three games yet I bet we would be hard presses to find anyone who, because of our play against VU, became a hard-core MT fan and is still on board today.
My question to you MT fans (I won't care if a rational VU lurker weighs in): What is the relevance of this series to the future of MT athletics? Does the attendance throughout the series matter? Does the record matter?