MT's marketing strategy leaves much to be desired.O
Our fans don't get excited no matter what we do.
MT's marketing strategy leaves much to be desired.O
Our fans don't get excited no matter what we do.
Let's look at your Boise example (If, by similar schedule as MT, you mean 3 games against P5 opponents):I look at Boise.
They play a similar schedule as MT and they will lose 1 or 2 games most years but they are viewed as relevant because they win 11-14 games each year and have done so for the past 15 years.
wku hasn't done that - not even close.
Thanks for clarifying!By similar schedule I mean that most of Boise's games are against G5 teams.
A few things in response :Again, they are not in SEC country and they are the only show in that whole entire wilderness state. Their fans would show up to watch them play southwest nowhere state 2am on a Tuesday. It's not an apples to apples situation.
They have donors and great relationships with businesses there too. They had the money to setup their situation. They're not a commuter school either. BTW, you can count BYU as a P5 IMO because it's a pretty top level program with great attendance and that game is always nationally televised.
A few things in response :
1) 50 years ago, Boise was a junior college and they've only been FBS 3-4 years longer than MT.
2) They built their fan base through sustained success and, most importantly, bowl wins. Fans and businesses attach their loyalties to value and success. Their fans show up and watch on a Tuesday at 2am because of the relationship the university has built with the fan base and the sustained success.
3) They are located in a county with a population of just over 400,000 (by comparison : Rutherford County is just over 300,000)
Different challenge, yes. MT is in the middle of SEC country, but surrounded by talent. Boise is in the middle of mountains with little football talent in the area (comparatively)We have a different challenge than Boise had to face. We're in the middle of $EC country and in a conference that, even though it's concerned about a footprint, isn't big enough to leave one. To most fans, G5 might as well be the new 1-AA and I don't see that changing. As for me, I don't worry much about who we're playing because I'm there to see the team in blue (or whatever color we decide to wear that day.) The upcoming schedules may be a step up, but if we're that worried about mid to lower lever P5 schools, maybe we should drop back down and get a rivalry going with Chattanooga.
Boise State has a huge advantage in that it's the university in the capital city of the state. Meanwhile, that state's traditional flagship is tucked away in the north in Moscow, Idaho.
The Big 10 schools recruit on a Big 10 level.I do wonder if we are supposedly a FBS school why we shouldn't be able to handle a schedule with 3 or 4 P5 teams? I mean B10 schools play 10 P5 games a year. I'm not for challenging the all 4 playoff semifinalists every year, but to say we can only play 1 game a year out against 65 teams in our division seems silly.
If a school is in a division and immediately says they have no business playing more than 1 game a year against half the division, then that school should not be in that division.
MT swung and missed because the university is reactive, not proactive. There's no vision.I think our window has closed...The winds are just too strong. No one saw the cutureal changes in students and how that impacts fandom and future support. Nobody saw the revenue decreases when we joined CUSA, couple that with full cost of tuition and our ability to fund what we have is in doubt.
All we ever had to do was win MT grads and we haven't done it.
We have to now play 3-4 P5 just to try to balance the budget. I will always be True-Blue and I will show up but dang, I feel like we swung and missed.
MT swung and missed because the university is reactive, not proactive. There's no vision.