Think most of us have been around the block to understand "talk is cheap". Deliverables on W&Ls, compliance, and academic integrity standards are the elements of which coach is judged. Obviously, initial press conferences yield the greatest program optimism that anyone receives (short of winning conference/national championships). As we saw with Deion Sanders' at Colorado, quality talent prevails by the end of the season. Colorado ultimately ran out of gas as hype only carries so far against bench strength and smart tactical decision-making.
First and foremost, I'm interested in Coach Mason's ability to develop a solid winning culture. Without it, no championships will ever be earned with this or any regime. Then we're back to the drawing board in 3-4 years. The next hires in AC and position coaches are vital and think Coach Mason has two years to demonstrate it's direction and improvement. Fans will know very quickly if executive decision makers were sold a bill of goods without doing enough due diligence. Or did we decide to cut corners to appease stakeholders to say we changed out front, but inside nothing else really changed regarding culture.