Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
facebook, youtube and other sites have censored this:
American doctors address covid-19 misinformation
If she said that the sky was blue, or maybe she believed in global warming, would you question her credibility?
Other doctors are vouching for HCQ as well.
This woman literally said ovarian cysts are from women having sex with demons and witches in their dreams. And the reptilians running government, that’s her. Do you honestly find a person who believes these things is credible?
The FDA, which is run by a Trump appointee, reviewed HCQ data and said it has safety issues for those with COVID and data show it’s not effective. Do you honestly think a Trump appointee would stop a drug Trump bragged about unless the evidence is clear?
It's book burningThe reason for my strong reaction to this is that this has moved beyond scientific debate to freedom or tyranny. With tyranny, you can kiss genuine science good bye. Science becomes what the tyrants proclaim or declare.
As I said, I don't know the women. Censoring her only added to the confusion when trying to uncover the facts. The one article that I did find was her asserting what she said was taken out of context of a complicated discussion. My point here is not to assert that she did or didn't say something. My alarm is the pattern of censorship and smearing of anyone that presents an opposing opinion.
So, if someone presents ideas contrary to the govt's established position, they should be silenced or censored? Really? That is where we are now as a nation?
If someone makes a claim about bloodletting, why censor them when anyone with 2 brain cells would know it's a bogus claim. Instead of censoring those people, a better response would be to offer truth, facts, and evidence to address the situation. The truth will win out. When censorship enters the arena, it's an admission that evidence is not on the side of those doing the censoring. History has demonstrated this over and over.
Have the debate. Demonstrate the evidence. Censoring the opposition will drive people to the side of the censored. History has demonstrated this again and again.
The reason for my strong reaction to this is that this has moved beyond scientific debate to freedom or tyranny. With tyranny, you can kiss genuine science good bye. Science becomes what the tyrants proclaim or declare.
It's book burning
It's a copyright issue but all of this nonsense wouldn't be happening if it were not an election year.Can you explain your rationale for why a private company should be forced to present content they don’t agree with or violates their user rules?
I agree with you about government censorship.
The govt didn’t censor her though. Private companies removed content from their platform. I am opposed to the fairness doctrine, whether it’s on TV, radio or social media. I do not think private companies should be forced to present content they do not agree with on their platform, especially if they believe that content is false or could hurt someone. Like rivals could delete my posts here, so can other companies on their sites. If I don’t like it, I go somewhere else. That’s not censorship or tyranny.
You don’t debate drug efficacy on social media. You present your data in publications that others can reproduce and you get a drug company that makes HCQ to apply for its use in Covid19 patients and presents your data to support its safety and effectiveness. I am skeptical of any person who says they have a drug that works, but data doesn’t support them and they don’t provide affirmative data for themselves. Going to social media tells me you don’t have real data.
I agree with you about government censorship.
The govt didn’t censor her though. Private companies removed content from their platform. I am opposed to the fairness doctrine, whether it’s on TV, radio or social media. I do not think private companies should be forced to present content they do not agree with on their platform, especially if they believe that content is false or could hurt someone. Like rivals could delete my posts here, so can other companies on their sites. If I don’t like it, I go somewhere else. That’s not censorship or tyranny.
You don’t debate drug efficacy on social media. You present your data in publications that others can reproduce and you get a drug company that makes HCQ to apply for its use in Covid19 patients and presents your data to support its safety and effectiveness. I am skeptical of any person who says they have a drug that works, but data doesn’t support them and they don’t provide affirmative data for themselves. Going to social media tells me you don’t have real data.