We think alike!!Will Healy would have to be on the short list.
Would interject some energy into the program for sure. He slayed it in recruiting at UTC and turned Peay around fast. Someone we could definitely afford but no way massaro would hire a young gun much less with no connection to the good ole South Carolina days.We think alike!!
I just don't see why Stock would walk away from what he has here.
There is no pressure. None. It might be the only FBS job in America where you don't have to meet any real standard or produce any real results.
We have a great coaching tree, and I think we would have a lot of interest in the program as a place where not only can you win, but you can move up into the P5 ranks. There's a lot of guys I think would be exciting to hire.
But I don't see any scenario where Stock walks away from this gig, and we apparently don't have a way to remove the albatross from around our necks, so we sail on......
Will Healy would have to be on the short list.
I agree. I think Stock, Franklin and West all retire.
Naw. We need him to hire the next batch of losers.Massaro too????
Whoa.Naw. We need him to hire the next batch of losers.
Paul Pasqualoni disapproves of this comment.
From an X's and O's standpoint, generally speaking, our staff is OK (except when facing Vanderbilt). Where we've had some serious issues lately is recruiting. Our recruiting just hasn't been very good.
The saying "it's not about X's and O's, it's about Jimmy and Joe's" come to mind.
With that said while facilities aren't everything I would say MTSU's are in the most need of work based on every SBC and C-USA school that I've seen. Concrete and Steel don't make a program but realisitically it's hard to recruit kids when the place looks like "The Fall of the House of Usher". There are FCS schools that have nicer facilities, the proposed Football Facilities can't come soon enough.
The saying "it's not about X's and O's, it's about Jimmy and Joe's" come to mind.
With that said while facilities aren't everything I would say MTSU's are in the most need of work based on every SBC and C-USA school that I've seen. Concrete and Steel don't make a program but realisitically it's hard to recruit kids when the place looks like "The Fall of the House of Usher". There are FCS schools that have nicer facilities, the proposed Football Facilities can't come soon enough.
That said, are our facilities really that bad? I know we're no Alabama or Tennessee or Clemson.
But it's hard to believe much smaller budgeted peer type schools (i'm thinking MAC, CUSA, SBC) have much better facilities than we do. I don't know, i'm just disbelieving I guess.
It's kind of hard to raise money for facilities when your program has suffered through years of mediocrity with know hope in ending.
It would be easier if we had some excitement around the program.
That said, are our facilities really that bad? I know we're no Alabama or Tennessee or Clemson.
But it's hard to believe much smaller budgeted peer type schools (i'm thinking MAC, CUSA, SBC) have much better facilities than we do. I don't know, i'm just disbelieving I guess.
I know we can use an indoor facility. Floyd looks ok to me though - certainly comparable to at least the G5 average. .
Kill the program on purpose. Restart ala UAB. Problem solved.
Right now the only one with guaranteed money is the Head Football Coach.....$6.6 million.
Maybe we shouldn't be an FBS school. We don't have the donors, we sure don't have the fan base. We are playing 3 money games a year now instead of just 1.
That happens when you have a medical school and are in the state's largest city...