The MAC is historically, and currently, a more respected and better football conference than the Sun Belt. The Sun Belt is essentially an FCS conference - literally half of their conference are FCS call ups. The schools you listed - App State and Coastal are recent FBS upstarts. App State has been a complete non factor since their upset of Michigan years and years ago, and Coastal had one good season where they beat absolutely nobody of note. Their best win since moving up is against..Kansas? I mean, it's great for them that they have had their success so early since joining FBS, but they've not done anything compared to what NIU, WMU, Toledo, etc have done
And - have you looked at a map recently? Where do you think MTSU is located, Miami? You're not even in what anyone considers to be the south. You are two hours southern of the tip of Illinois. You are 100% in yankee territory in the true south's eyes.
Also - take a look at your own facilities. Are they better than what we have in the MAC? No. Is the MACs facilities better than your would-be CUSA conference mates, Liberty, Sam Houston, and other random FCS schools? Yes.
I can understand you wanting to play southern teams. But don't make asinine attacks at the MAC. The Sun Belt is not, and has never been on par with the MAC. Our TV deal (4x bigger than the Sun Belts) is proof of that. The Sun Belt will be what it always was - a temporary, unstable conference for teams who want to make the jump to FBS.
If you think taking a piddly 20m in exit fees would be enough for you to go Power5, or whatever your end goal is, you are completely wrong. Not only will laywers see that you never get anything near that amount, and even if your inept AD didn't squander it, 20m isn't enough to build a new equipment shed. You're far better off in the MAC, earning 4x more in TV money every year than you currently are, and not having to worry about being left in the lurch every single time a conference realignment is kicked off.