It would figure that the one time MT does something interesting in the last 10 years, I’m in France with a 6 hour delay and terrible internet connections to follow along:
Some more thoughts after chewing on this:
Pros: I think Mason is a good coach. I think he did well at Vandy. His teams were well coached, put guys in the NFL, and won against some major teams, and went to bowl games. I’m not sure you can reasonably expect more at Vandy, where the gap between Vandy and its conference rivals are probably bigger than any in any conference. I put little stock in his record (especially the Covid year). Rich Rod probably did less with more in his two stops at Michigan and Arizona than Mason did at Vandy, and RR is doing fine at JSU.
He is well respected and traveled in the industry, and should have connections to build a staff. He will play well on the recruiting trail and should make MT a portal player.
He is a name that casuals will know, and should generate some interest.
Cons: Smacks of low hanging fruit. An out of work guy already established in the mid-state? I could totally see Mason pitching how bad he wants to be here and how he sees this as a lifetime job and blah blah blah and that would seemingly be very attractive to M&M for some reason. Call me a cynic, but I could see how Mason would view this as the last job he’d ever have to take and M&M thinking that they’ve solved their problem for the long term. Pop the Champagne bottles!
I don’t want Mason here in 2029. He either wins big and moves back up, or he gets fired. There can be no more puttering along here. Win, and get promoted. Or GTFO. Ok, ok, if you just like Murfreesboro traffic and Toots and you want to stay, then you get one year added for every conference title. Otherwise, GTFO.
I also think that this is a hire that also smells a little bit of culture and off field importance rather than on field competitiveness. We already know the importance placed on APR and running a clean program with good kids. Mason, coming from Stanford and Vandy, very well could tout that to McPhee. There’s nothing wrong with that, it’s noble and frankly, probably more in line with the spirit of college sports than anything. But it’s not the easiest road to athletic success. There’s room for both, but we can’t let APR become more important than W-L record.
Overall: I think it’s a good hire and I’m behind Mason.
I was never sold on some the other names. Banks and Mack were ok, probably about the same level of excitement as Mason. Banks is on thin ice with the UT fan base, and Mack is just a position coach with a rough stint as Rice OC on his record.
Walden I know only from his game vs UT where they showed some scrappy-ness but still got blown out by a mediocre UT team. Diaz would have been a home run I think, but I also think that he probably is a bit overrated, he didn’t do much at Miami ( and, if he was holding out for Duke, then I can totally see us moving on to Mason, can’t wait forever.)
The most interesting name on the interview list was the SMU OC.
Some more thoughts after chewing on this:
Pros: I think Mason is a good coach. I think he did well at Vandy. His teams were well coached, put guys in the NFL, and won against some major teams, and went to bowl games. I’m not sure you can reasonably expect more at Vandy, where the gap between Vandy and its conference rivals are probably bigger than any in any conference. I put little stock in his record (especially the Covid year). Rich Rod probably did less with more in his two stops at Michigan and Arizona than Mason did at Vandy, and RR is doing fine at JSU.
He is well respected and traveled in the industry, and should have connections to build a staff. He will play well on the recruiting trail and should make MT a portal player.
He is a name that casuals will know, and should generate some interest.
Cons: Smacks of low hanging fruit. An out of work guy already established in the mid-state? I could totally see Mason pitching how bad he wants to be here and how he sees this as a lifetime job and blah blah blah and that would seemingly be very attractive to M&M for some reason. Call me a cynic, but I could see how Mason would view this as the last job he’d ever have to take and M&M thinking that they’ve solved their problem for the long term. Pop the Champagne bottles!
I don’t want Mason here in 2029. He either wins big and moves back up, or he gets fired. There can be no more puttering along here. Win, and get promoted. Or GTFO. Ok, ok, if you just like Murfreesboro traffic and Toots and you want to stay, then you get one year added for every conference title. Otherwise, GTFO.
I also think that this is a hire that also smells a little bit of culture and off field importance rather than on field competitiveness. We already know the importance placed on APR and running a clean program with good kids. Mason, coming from Stanford and Vandy, very well could tout that to McPhee. There’s nothing wrong with that, it’s noble and frankly, probably more in line with the spirit of college sports than anything. But it’s not the easiest road to athletic success. There’s room for both, but we can’t let APR become more important than W-L record.
Overall: I think it’s a good hire and I’m behind Mason.
I was never sold on some the other names. Banks and Mack were ok, probably about the same level of excitement as Mason. Banks is on thin ice with the UT fan base, and Mack is just a position coach with a rough stint as Rice OC on his record.
Walden I know only from his game vs UT where they showed some scrappy-ness but still got blown out by a mediocre UT team. Diaz would have been a home run I think, but I also think that he probably is a bit overrated, he didn’t do much at Miami ( and, if he was holding out for Duke, then I can totally see us moving on to Mason, can’t wait forever.)
The most interesting name on the interview list was the SMU OC.