ADVERTISEMENT

Ted Cruz’s Book Denied Bestseller Status by New York Times Even Though it Placed Third in Sales

nashvillegoldenflash

Hall of Famer
Dec 10, 2006
7,377
206
63
If you needed more proof that the Left is petrified of presidential candidate Ted Cruz, look no further.

What is it about a man with traditional values and who loves America that has Democrats all riled up? Oh, right…

So, get this…

The New York Times is denying Cruz’s new book A Time for Truth bestseller status, even though it outsold 18 of the 20 other books on the list.

This would be comical if it weren’t so ridiculous. Though, liberals truly are beyond parody (click web address below).

http://www.youngcons.com/ted-cruzs-...k-times-even-though-it-placed-third-in-sales/
 
That great bastion of journalistic integrity, The New York Times, has been doing their best to slight Ted Cruz by not placing him on the bestseller list, accusing him of “strategic bulk purchases.”

Cruz has repeatedly called for the NYT to release the evidence behind this claim, which they haven’t done, and as if that — along with this “publications” obvious liberal bent — isn’t enough to make you think something’s fishy, the fact Amazon is backing Cruz should do the trick.

From Politico:

The New York Times’ refusal to put Ted Cruz’s memoir on its bestseller list is once again being called into question — this time by Amazon, the largest Internet retailer in the country.

On Sunday, an Amazon spokesperson told the On Media blog that the company’s sales data showed no evidence of unusual bulk purchase activity for the Texas senator’s memoir, casting further doubt on the Times’ claim that the book — “A Time For Truth” — had been omitted from its list because sales had been driven by “strategic bulk purchases.”

“As of yesterday, ‘A Time for Truth’ was the number 13 bestselling book, and there is no evidence of unusual bulk purchase activity in our sales data,” Sarah Gelman, Amazon’s director of press relations, said in an email.

Amazon’s findings match those of HarperCollins, the book’s publisher, which said Friday that it had “investigated the sales pattern” for Cruz’s book and found “no evidence of bulk orders or sales through any retailer or organization.” Moments after that announcement, Cruz’s campaign issued a press release accusing the Times of lying and calling on the paper to provide evidence of bulk purchasing or else formally apologize.

“The Times is presumably embarrassed by having their obvious partisan bias called out. But their response — alleging ‘strategic bulk purchases’ — is a blatant falsehood,” Cruz campaign spokesperson Rick Tyler said in a statement Friday. “The evidence is directly to the contrary. In leveling this false charge, the Times has tried to impugn the integrity of Senator Cruz and of his publisher HarperCollins.”

Remember way back in the day when journalists used to be consumed by a pursuit for truth and fact rather than being tools in the hands of politicians being used to push forward an agenda?

It seems those days are long gone, doesn’t it?

The bottom line here is that Ted Cruz is someone who stands boldly for conservative values and principles, which just doesn’t sit well with the NYT, so seeing as how he’s a big threat to the progressive agenda, they’re doing their part to help Democrats stay in power by attempting to slight the man and make him look like a charlatan.

What the NYT doesn’t understand is their credibility is shot full of holes and anyone with more than one brain cell knows better than to believe the majority of what they print and publish.

Cruz needs to stick to his guns, which he’s doing, and keep fighting the good fight, regardless of how much push back he gets, and eventually the lefties will cave.

They always do.

(click the web address below to hear Mark Levin discuss The New York Times refusing to put A Time for Change on its best selling list).

http://www.youngcons.com/nyt-refuse...amazons-response-will-make-them-very-unhappy/
 
Why would they single Cruz out? They have put plenty of conservatives on their best seller list. Just seems like another ploy by Cruz to play the victim which is about all he is good at these days. That being said I hope like hell Cruz gets the Republican nod. It may be the only thing that could save us from Clinton losing. There are about 3 or 4 that I am certain she can beat easily. Cruz is one of them. Trump, Huckabee and Santorum round out the list. Anybody else would be a fight.
 
BTW most conservatives do this to seem like their views are more popular than they are. Go to any local Goodwill store and you will see hundreds of brand new untouched copies of the conservatives' "best sellers". In fairness Hillary probably had to do it too. I just haven't been to Goodwill since her book was released.
 
Ted Cruz feuds with the New York Times — and loves it
The Texas senator is making the most of the Gray Lady’s refusal to put his book on its bestseller list.

By Dylan Byers

7/10/15 7:46 PM EDT

150710_ted_cruz_byers_ap_1160_1160x629.jpg

AP Photo

The campaign gods are smiling down on Ted Cruz, gifting him a feud with conservatives’ most despised news outlet at a time when most 2016 campaigns are gasping for Trump-free air.

At issue: The New York Times refuses to grant the Texas senator’s memoir, “A Time for Truth,” a place on its powerful list of bestselling books, despite his publisher’s insistence that his numbers should vault him well ahead of other titles in the top 10.

News of Cruz’s exclusion broke this week after HarperCollins, the book’s publisher, sent a letter to the Times inquiring about its omission from the list, sources with knowledge of the situation told POLITICO, which first reported the story. The Times responded by telling HarperCollins that the book did not meet their criteria for inclusion.

On Thursday, a Times spokesperson said that the book was excluded because the paper had found its sales to be mostly “strategic bulk purchases” — a common practice among political authors, but a claim hotly disputed by Cruz’s campaign.

“The Times is presumably embarrassed by having their obvious partisan bias called out. But their response — alleging ‘strategic bulk purchases’ — is a blatant falsehood,” Cruz campaign spokesperson Rick Tyler said in a statement Friday. “The evidence is directly to the contrary. In leveling this false charge, the Times has tried to impugn the integrity of Senator Cruz and of his publisher Harper Collins.”

“We call on the Times, release your so-called ‘evidence.’ Demonstrate that your charge isn’t simply a naked fabrication, designed to cover up your own partisan agenda,” Tyler continued. “And, if you cannot do so, then issue a public apology to Senator Cruz and Harper Collins editor Adam Bellow for making false charges against them.”

Tyler’s blast came just minutes after HarperCollins announced it had found “no evidence of bulk orders or sales through any retailer or organization” — a statement that all but accused the Times of lying. The publisher also pointed out that ‘A Time For Truth’ “ranked high on other publishing industry bestseller lists including Nielsen Bookscan (#4) … The Wall Street Journal (#4) and Barnes and Noble (#7),” all of which “omit bulk orders books from their rankings.”

Cruz’s camp is clearly relishing the controversy, which has been good for business.

“It’s been a good week and a half with wall-to-wall coverage of the book, and yes, this latest unfortunate news courtesy of the New York Times is a chance to get yet more attention and drive readers to Senator Cruz’s book,” said Keith Urbahn, co-founder of Javelin, a D.C.-based literary agency and communications firm that represented Cruz on the deal and helped with his book rollout. “This controversy is already helping sales.”

Several Cruz-linked Twitter accounts, including @TedCruz, also retweeted a Washington Post blog post with the headline, “Ted Cruz hits the jackpot: A book war with the New York Times.”

Cruz is somewhat better positioned than many of his fellow 2016 rivals, who have struggled to get attention since real estate mogul Donald Trump entered the race.

Not Cruz. Not only is his book a success, giving him a second round of publicity after his May 23 launch, he also appears to be having little trouble raising funds. His campaign announced this week that he had raised at least $51 million split between the official campaign and four super PACs, putting him in second place in the money race behind former Florida governor Jeb Bush and well ahead of Marco Rubio and Scott Walker.

In that sense, Cruz’s feud with the Times is a happy bonus.

Eileen Murphy, the Times spokesperson, said Friday that the paper was standing by her initial claim that the “overwhelming preponderance of evidence was that sales [of Cruz’s book] were limited to strategic bulk purchases.” Murphy did not respond to a request for comment regarding the Cruz campaign’s statement.

In her initial response, Murphy said the Times had “uniform standards that we apply to our best seller list, which includes an analysis of book sales that goes beyond simply the number of books sold.” She later added, “Our goal is that the list reflect authentic best sellers, so we look at and analyze not just numbers, but patterns of sales for every book.”

The Cruz campaign called Murphy’s initial explanation “cryptic,” and her later claims about bulk purchases “false.”

“Their decision to blackball Cruz’s book suggests that the Times very much does not want people to read the book,” the campaign said. “There were no ‘strategic bulk purchases.’ Cruz spent last week on a nationwide book tour, signing copies of his book at multiple locations. Booksellers at each event had long lines — sometimes over 400 people per event.”

“A Time For Truth” was published on June 30 and sold 11,854 copies in its first week, according to Nielsen Bookscan’s hardcover sale numbers. That’s more than 18 of the 20 titles that will appear on the bestseller list for the week ending July 4, including Aziz Ansari’s “Modern Romance,” which is #2 on the list, and Ann Coulter’s “Adios America,” which is #11.

Cruz’s memoir has also sold more copies in a single week than Rand Paul’s “Taking a Stand,” which has been out for more than a month, and more than Marco Rubio’s “American Dreams,” which has been out for six months.

That may partly be the result of much more aggressive promotion, and partly because Cruz’s book is simply more interesting, with revealing anecdotes about his half-sister’s drug overdose, his time looking at pornography while clerking on the Supreme Court, and his blistering attacks on his fellow Republicans.

“What will really make this book a long-term success is that Senator Cruz deliberately decided not to craft a boilerplate book of safe bromides, like most politicians do,” Urbahn said.

A public brawl with The New York Times won’t hurt, either. As the Post’s Philip Bump noted, “When Costco axed Dinesh D’Souza’s book from its shelves last summer for poor sales, the resulting outcry ensured so much demand that Costco quickly restocked it.”

“It’s important to look at a book like a campaign, setting the groundwork early and then seizing opportunities,” noted Urbahn. “The New York Times, ironically, offered us exactly that.”
 
"Cruz needs to stick to his guns, which he’s doing, and keep fighting the good fight, regardless of how much push back he gets, and eventually the lefties will cave.

They always do."


Cruz it or lose it! You go, Ted!!! ;)
 
Posted on July 13, 2015 by John Hinderaker in Media Bias, Ted Cruz
NY Times Taking a Beating In Its Battle With Ted Cruz

We wrote here about Ted Cruz’s feud with the New York Times. Cruz’s new book, A Time for Truth, is a hot seller, apparently #3 among hard cover nonfiction books. But the Times refused to list it on its best seller list, claiming that its “sales were limited to strategic bulk purchases.” Both Cruz and his publisher, HarperCollins, have denied the charge, and Cruz has challenged the Times either to provide evidence to back up its claim, or else apologize.

Now Amazon has entered the fray, stating publicly that there is “is no evidence of unusual bulk purchase activity in our sales data.” As of last report, A Time for Truth is #13 at Amazon among all books, not just hard cover nonfiction. Other sources that track book sales evidently agree that there is nothing fishy about Cruz’s book’s sales:

As HarperCollins has noted, Cruz’s book “ranked high on other publishing industry bestseller lists including Nielsen Bookscan (#4) … The Wall Street Journal (#4) and Barnes and Noble (#7),” all of which “omit bulk orders books from their rankings.”

So the Times appears to have backed itself into a corner. Will it cave in and start listing A Time for Truth in a manner consistent with the book’s sales? Will it apologize to Cruz and HarperCollins? It is perhaps worth noting that legally, it is just about impossible to defame a politician. But that isn’t true of a publisher. If the Times said that it didn’t list Cruz’s book because its “sales were limited to strategic bulk purchases,” while knowing that this statement was untrue or having no grounds to believe it true, HarperCollins could very well have a cause of action against the Times, should the publisher choose to pursue it.

Meanwhile, Tom Lipscomb, a former CEO of Times Books, has written us with his thoughts on the controversy:

As President of Times Books at the NY Times, I got quite accustomed to arbitrary activities at the New York Times Book Review, usually directed at “politically undesirable” books.

I hate “bulk sales” and fake political bestsellers too, and some right wing publishers are experts at it, but Harper Collins certainly has the internal tools to know where their inventory is going. You might want to ask the NYTBR how the bulk sales influenced their Best Seller List reporting on Hillary’s last bomb.

You might find it interesting to actually sit down with Harper’s sales manager and take a look at their sales outflow on the Cruz book, and then try to go over to the NYTBR and get them to show you their “evidence.” You are likely to find disarming openness at a commercial enterprise like Harper, and a total haughty coverup at what is supposed to be a transparent media company that serves the public.

You’ll also find the NYTBR relies more on self-reporting by bookstores filled with attitude and Harper just relies on boring invoices and numbers. Given the kind of people who run bookstores the results of bookseller attitude are predictable. A heartbreaking story of a one legged orphan in Detroit who became the 3rd string place kicker for the Detroit Lions will rocket up the bestseller list far ahead of its actual sales, while some proto-fascist politician from flyover country will be denied the attention he would get if the thousands of yahoos who buy his execrable book were given their proper due.

The NYT Bestseller list depends on “reporting from bookstores;” not statistics. Harper has cold, hard, figures on actual orders placed, bulk or NOT.

Make them both show down.

No doubt in my mind what we will learn.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT