ADVERTISEMENT

LADY RAIDER BB MIDDLE TENNESSEE (4-1) @ Florida A&M (0-6) , Tues. Nov 26, 11 am central, ESPN+

MTFAN61

All Conference
Gold Member
Aug 11, 2022
1,868
2,360
113
The Lady Raiders play an early contest at struggling Florida A&M Tuesday.
Important takeaways for MT is to focus on the Lady Rattlers, & to not be distracted by the upcoming Thanksgiving tournament later in the week. Important to get out to a comfortable lead so the coaching staff can hopefully allow for more liberal substitutions especially in the 2nd half. It will be of a major benefit if we can go in with decently fresh legs against back to back power conference schools.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MTOleBlue
Agree, hope we see a ton of bench play in this one which will pay dividends when we face Purdue, ISU, K-State, etc. in the next month.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MTFAN61
Unless the MT WBB schedule sight was in error it shows the ESPN+ caption for A&M game tomorrow. That being said I just reviewed the same sight, but under A&M's schedule. They however don't list ESPN+ on any of their games.
Looking at ESPN+ app I agree with you. I believe our website must have included the ESPN logo for the game in error. That sucks. Good catch though.
 
It's 2024 and SWAC schools still can't field someone to film/commentate their home games. I don't see an option to view this game although I thought it would be on ESPN+ from a contractual obligation. My best guess is they either don't have the resources to film to game, or (more likely) they have no one that can produce/PBP/Color the game. I've seen SWAC schools in the past do a live stream on YouTube, but I'm afraid there will be no viewing options for today's game.

As far as a scout goes Florida A&M could potentially be the worst team we play this year (SIUE may also fall into that category starting 0-3, but they've both played UCF and FAMU lost by 25 vs. SIUE losing by 10). Currently RPI #339 of 362 possible teams and 0-6 start against a mild Non-Conf (4 games in Quad 3, 2 games in Quad 4). They don't do anything particularly well, but they have a pair of scorers to keep an eye on. Sophomore Sydney Hendrix (#5, 5'11" F) leads the Lady Rattlers with 12.5 ppg on 46% FG. She does all her work inside the paint and scores a lot on offensive rebounds. Hendrix however is a turnover machine when she is pressured (27 turnovers in 6 games). I think if they would give her the ball in situations she didn't have to dribble, she would be very good for the low-major game. Syracuse-transfer, Graduate Cheyenne McEvans (#24, 5'9") is their best player, in my opinion. She is second on the team with 11.4 ppg. She is a more disciplined shooter and you can tell she's spent time on a P5 roster. In terms of turnovers/minutes she takes the best care of the ball at the SG position and is shooting 7/11 from deep.

I think the Lady Raiders play this game 100 times over this should never be closer than 10 points. We are better at every position 2 deep to our bench, and winning by 45 points last year is a good indication of that, too. I see signs of second year coach Bridgette Gordon moving the program into a good direction with the transfer pick-ups, but this matchup should be nothing more than an opportunity to execute your half court offense and prepare for a big weekend. If there was something I'd really want to see is populating to the basketball on defense. Rebounding is vital to success against Iowa State this Saturday and hopefully that's a habit they play with against any opponent. Also, I want to see some life on offense. The three-point shooting has left a lot to be desired -- currently 28.2% 3FG would be the worst in program history since 2013-14 (27.8% 3FG). I know it's a small sample size, but this team has too much talent to be in the bottom of that particular stat.
 
I searched as far and wide as possible. FAMU has a Rattler+ subscription service to few some of their live events. Unfortunately, even this game is not on that streaming service.

Live Stats and Joe Fisher it is!
 
Nice write up. Yes, our 3 point shooting has been really poor. Gregory started off very rough her first3 games, but is now back on point from long range. My main concern is from our 4 & 5. Why Arike & Boldyreva are shooting from 3 so much is beyond me. They are having a terrible season from beyond the arc. Coach has obviously given everyone the green light which apparently includes both of our bigs. If we could just leave the 3 point shooting primarily to Gregory, Blakely, & Scott our shooting % would be back in the low to mid 30's in no time.
 
Nice write up. Yes, our 3 point shooting has been really poor. Gregory started off very rough her first3 games, but is now back on point from long range. My main concern is from our 4 & 5. Why Arike & Boldyreva are shooting from 3 so much is beyond me. They are having a terrible season from beyond the arc. Coach has obviously given everyone the green light which apparently includes both of our bigs. If we could just leave the 3 point shooting primarily to Gregory, Blakely, & Scott our shooting % would be back in the low to mid 30's in no time.
I wouldn't be discouraged of Arike shooting from deep. She isn't the best with a career average just under 24% 3FG, but her 15% to start the season has left much to be desired. We've been spoiled with Whitson in year's past. Arike shoots with the guards in practice and can catch fire (3/4 against UT-Southern). I would just have a quicker hook -- when it's off, stop shooting.

Nas has less volume but shot 46% 3FG on 35 attempts last year which is exceptional from her type of player. She's only shot 5 three pointers thus far (1 made 3P for 20%) so I wouldn't say she's shooting it too much. Maybe being more selective in the threes she attempts, sure.
 
Anastsia can do it in practice. At one practice every player on the team went through a drill to see who could make the most 3's from different locations in a period of time. The 1,2's were on one goal and the 3's, 4's and 5's were on the other. Savannah Wheeler took the title at one end with 31 or 32. I know she hasn't hit one in a game yet, but she can do it. Nas won with 35 on her side, so she can do it in practice. I wouldn't give up on her in games. She also may want to show the WNBA she can do it and since the rumor is that she turned down a 6 figure NIL to stay here, the coach may let her do shoot some more than he normally would. Arike did start her career as a 2 and or 3. Of course when you have your 4 or 5 shooting 3's, they had better be accurate as you have less rebounding support inside.
 
Last edited:
LOTS of pressure in the second half with double and triple teaming up the court, but for some reason Insell refuses to call a timeout and takes the team until 3:30 left in the game to figure out to throw over the top of the press. I get wanting to give the bench experience but it's not that helpful for their in-game ability to NOT COACH THEM IN GAME.
 
Starters had a great showing leading 62-17 with 4 minutes left in the 3rd.

However, it's not encouraging to see the reserves get outscored 18-37 in the final 14 minutes. I know FAMU ran a chaotic, aggressive full court press (Joe said they were getting away with fouls, I guess the officials considered the game out of reach), but I'd like to hear we made some sort of adjustment.

Let's get ready for Purdue!
 
  • Like
Reactions: MTOleBlue
Post game coach said they are trying to finalize the backup 4 spot. Mentioned Ana's name 2-3 times. Take it he's liking Milanovic's development. Wouldn't be surprised we see her backing up Arike over Monson. I like her 6' 3" height.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MTOleBlue
I guess I'm the unpopular opinion that doesn't really understand the criticism of Arike. Pretty clear she's a classic power forward playing in an offense that uses the 4 in more of the European style, ironically enough.

She's an all-conference defender, an above average passer and has been nearly automatic from the charity stripe and we're talking about limiting her shots just because she went 1-4 and 0-5 in a few games. For all the love Whitson gets as a shooter around here, she had at least 9-10 games where she shot 20% and I don't recall anyone around here talking about giving her the hook.

The other 4 starters are capable of leading the team in scoring on a given night, perfectly ok to have 1 starter that doesn't shoot that well and doesn't try to force something that's not there. Rant over
 
Arike is very solid in that 4 spot; an outstanding defender and playmaker. Her presence alone is game-altering. I think the challenge is finding her backup but I'm pleased to hear Ana is gaining ground with the coaches... I've been very impressed with her skills, her energy, and her effort.
 
  • Like
Reactions: crassyblue
I guess I'm the unpopular opinion that doesn't really understand the criticism of Arike. Pretty clear she's a classic power forward playing in an offense that uses the 4 in more of the European style, ironically enough.

She's an all-conference defender, an above average passer and has been nearly automatic from the charity stripe and we're talking about limiting her shots just because she went 1-4 and 0-5 in a few games. For all the love Whitson gets as a shooter around here, she had at least 9-10 games where she shot 20% and I don't recall anyone around here talking about giving her the hook.

The other 4 starters are capable of leading the team in scoring on a given night, perfectly ok to have 1 starter that doesn't shoot that well and doesn't try to force something that's not there. Rant over
Will grant Arike she probably had her best game so far yesterday. 5-7 from the field, 1-1 from three, & 4 rebounds.
In her defense she has never been used to playing so many minutes per game in her life. You can imagine some of her shooting woes were due to tired legs. I agree she is far & away our best #4. If she continues to build up her body, & coach can give her a few minutes of occasional rest it would be great for her & the team as a whole both. Hopefully Milanovic might be a suitable relief on occasion as a quality backup.
 
I guess I'm the unpopular opinion that doesn't really understand the criticism of Arike. Pretty clear she's a classic power forward playing in an offense that uses the 4 in more of the European style, ironically enough.

She's an all-conference defender, an above average passer and has been nearly automatic from the charity stripe and we're talking about limiting her shots just because she went 1-4 and 0-5 in a few games. For all the love Whitson gets as a shooter around here, she had at least 9-10 games where she shot 20% and I don't recall anyone around here talking about giving her the hook.

The other 4 starters are capable of leading the team in scoring on a given night, perfectly ok to have 1 starter that doesn't shoot that well and doesn't try to force something that's not there. Rant over
I think CRI put it best when he said "Arike isn't Courtney Whitson, and Whitson isn't Elina Arike." Her primary role, so far, is to be a lock down defender. She is a lot better at defending opposing 4s/5s whereas Whitson wasn't as versatile because of her height. Arike has been arguably the most consistent defender in the low post this year.

However, Whitson was a career 32% 3FG and shot it a lot from deep (set a career high 241 attempts last year), where Arike is 24% 3FG and the most attempts in a season was 46 her redshirt-sophomore season at UTEP (she's on pace for 73 attempts in 31 games this year). It's an apple to orange comparison from three point shooting perspective. If she could get closer to that 30% mark it would space the floor more which would open the lane more for Scott and Blakely to get to the rim. It hasn't hindered us much thus far, but it could be a scout emphasis if the 21% 3FG shooting continues late into the season.

I think both sides of the coin have a legitimate argument. Would I be happy if she made more, of course. Just the one 0/5 game is a bad look and I don't want to see it spiral into one of Whitson's games that you alluded to -- fitting a square peg into a round hole, if you will. 5 3pt attempts isn't her game.

And to add context, Whitson had 14 games last season where she shot <= 20% 3FG, and had 23 games where she missed 4+ 3pt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MTOleBlue
Arike is very solid in that 4 spot; an outstanding defender and playmaker. Her presence alone is game-altering. I think the challenge is finding her backup but I'm pleased to hear Ana is gaining ground with the coaches... I've been very impressed with her skills, her energy, and her effort.
If she continues to play lock down defense and rebound 7-8 rebounds a game, the added points are just a bonus. Against Grand Canyon, I was watching how she locked down the players in front of her with NAS hovering menacingly behind her. It was formidable.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT