From the article...."Haslam is expected to establish a transitional committee that would work out details of the restructuring and a timetable. The largest Board of Regents universities — Memphis and Middle Tennessee State University — would likely get their own governing boards first, with benchmarks established for the other four — Austin Peay State University, East Tennessee State University, Tennessee State University and Tennessee Tech University — to eventually follow."That's what happens when you have "University of" in front of your name, instead of being anchored with "state university"
A positive step toward UMT and the growth of the university. I'm a firm believer that the universities individual stakeholders (faculty, staff, and alumni) have the best vision for the university."Haslam is expected to establish a transitional committee that would work out details of the restructuring and a timetable. The largest Board of Regents universities — Memphis and Middle Tennessee State University — would likely get their own governing boards first, with benchmarks established for the other four — Austin Peay State University, East Tennessee State University, Tennessee State University and Tennessee Tech University — to eventually follow."
That's what happens when you have "University of" in front of your name, instead of being anchored with "state university"
From the article...."Haslam is expected to establish a transitional committee that would work out details of the restructuring and a timetable. The largest Board of Regents universities — Memphis and Middle Tennessee State University — would likely get their own governing boards first, with benchmarks established for the other four — Austin Peay State University, East Tennessee State University, Tennessee State University and Tennessee Tech University — to eventually follow."
Sounds to me like we're getting lumped in with Memphis State on this one. (As you know I do agree, however, our name needs to be changed.)
AMENWell it remains to be seen. I just hope the governor would not be filling a MT board with his utk buddies. A board would need to be almost all MT alumns as far as I am concerned and only those that don't spend their money and their weekends in Knoxville.
TSU is the obvious issue here... and maybe Austin Peay... The rest of the schools provide regional education for the State. And many have specalities the others do not. I would not be surprised if MTSU becomes TSU and has two campuses on in Murfreesboro and the other in Nashville (in the distant future).
Could be good, could be bad; But IMHO this will do little to actually "help" MT get where most of us want to see our university go. Hope I'm wrong but the state will still hold the purse strings. More than this change in organization MT needs political clout - something we've been missing for a couple of decades.
I would not jump to quickly to think this will be better. It could in fact marginalize us even more. Caution recommended.
TSU's refusal to comment speaks volumes about what this could mean for TSU and MTSU.Understandably, a cautious approach is smart when any sort of politics is involved. With that qualifier noted, on to the pressing issues.
Perhaps the biggest issue, this just may be the chance in a lifetime for our generation to effect any real significant change at our alma mater. As for myself and similarly minded others, this just might provide a shot at some of the real changes in vision, leadership, and direction for the university where there have been so many problems. Now is not the time to sit back and wait to see what happens. If any of us dedicated MTSU alums know anybody with any say in state govt, this is the time to speak up, advocate, and lobby for MTSU, er, just maybe, UMT.
Since today is the first that I have heard anything about this, I acknowledge I could be missing a lot of information. In the couple/few articles I've read, a little political breakdown.
Instant unprepared responses from Memphis and MT seem optimistic and hopeful for positive changes. APSU and TSU did not seem to like to hear of this upcoming development in state administration of higher ed. TSU flat out refused to comment. Translation, over represented in TBR TSU & APSU are now afraid their worst fears are coming true. While schools such as Memphis and MT see this as an opportunity for good change and growth, APSU and TSU don't seem to share that attitude. With APSU and TSU and the TBR, funding and decisions kept APSU and TSU on similarly even ground with MT and Memphis. It's not even about their growth, it's about them holding back MT and Memphis from pulling away from AP and TSU through TBR funding and decisions. TSU, that place would have been run into the ground by the string of administrators had it not been TBR bailing them out. Guess who lost resources to support a dysfunctional TSU admin. Yep, you know the answer.
It looks like Haslem already has this worked out with the legislature with some new higher ed success act. My initial response is that MT people must get a hold of state reps/senators who have a dog in the race. Starting with local reps around MT, bill sponsors, and committee members. This just might be a chance to get a new university name written into this massive higher education overall act. That way, a name change would be locked in up front. No lingering for years waiting to see if McPhee will suddenly find interest in the idea. If there is momentum for this bill like I suspect, this is when amendments get thrown into these bills to satisfy the constituency.
Beyond the initial legislation, it does look like it will open up MT for more legitimate govt in the long run. Just maybe, that will include academic upgrades, grad programs, and hopefully professional schools in addition to PhD research. I would like to see a run at a name change on the front end instead of waiting for slow govt to move on the backend.
Folks, now is the time to contact your reps in state govt. Loyal dedicated MT people need to be placed on the new board that oversees MT. It also just maybe the time to try to get the name change thrown into the legislation. I have found the local state reps and senators to be really responsive to reasonable knowledgeable requests for action regarding legislation.
The closure of the state's only public HBCU would be horrible PR for the state and the politicians. In short, TSU isn't going anywhere.Here are my random thoughts.
- I just don't see TSU and MTSU ever combining to one University and the reason is TSU is an historically black college, this is very important to them. They will lose that identify, in today's PC world I just don't see this happening
- The state is going to be dealing with FEWER dollars in the future. Its not efficient for a state to have multiple colleges doing similar things. So there will be no professional schools at MT beyond what we have.
- MT doesn't not have a donor base to privately fund a bunch of new stuff, why would our alumni base rise up now?
- Lastly, we don't have a leader who is willing to go against the tide.
This is just moving chairs around with no real impact. My thoughts, I have been wrong before
Engineering would be the hardest sell.With TTU and TSU, both with engineering depts, within a few miles I just don't see MT ever having a "real" (Engineering Tech doesn't count) engineering program. Stranger things have happened but I think it would be a hard sell to taxpayers and especially the anti-tax zealots in state government at this time.
I think UT is the only public oneWho has the dentistry school in TN?
I think UT is the only public one
I think we should adopt the Louisiana nomenclature and have TSU at Nashville and TSU at Murfreesboro.