This shows how really bad our recruiting is.
While there is a fair argument that MT should be targeting (and signing) more premier prospects, MT's facilities are behind. Way behind. I worked in FBS ops and recruiting for 18 months for another program and MT's football facilities weren't even in the same playing field as the competition.
Consider these comparisons :
The fact that these coaches can bring in FBS talent with the current facilities shows they can recruiting. I know some will make the chicken/egg argument, but at some point, MT fans/alumni/supporters need to stop "competing" and start winning by donating the money necessary to build the facilities.
- TSU has an indoor facility (even Oakland HS has one)
- WKU's stadium includes a "football ops facility" that houses coaches offices, strength and conditioning, athletic training, equipment room, and locker room in one facility
- UAB is building a football ops/"indoor" facility
- Marshall has an indoor facility
I've covered MT recruiting for 5 out of the last 7 years and here's what the recruits what the recruits have consistently told me about what they look for in a program :
1) Coaches that "show the love"
2) Facilities
3) Winning bowls/championships
While there is a fair argument that MT should be targeting (and signing) more premier prospects, MT's facilities are behind. Way behind. I worked in FBS ops and recruiting for 18 months for another program and MT's football facilities weren't even in the same playing field as the competition.
Consider these comparisons :
The fact that these coaches can bring in FBS talent with the current facilities shows they can recruiting. I know some will make the chicken/egg argument, but at some point, MT fans/alumni/supporters need to stop "competing" and start winning by donating the money necessary to build the facilities.
- TSU has an indoor facility (even Oakland HS has one)
- WKU's stadium includes a "football ops facility" that houses coaches offices, strength and conditioning, athletic training, equipment room, and locker room in one facility
- UAB is building a football ops/"indoor" facility
- Marshall has an indoor facility
I've covered MT recruiting for 5 out of the last 7 years and here's what the recruits what the recruits have consistently told me about what they look for in a program :
1) Coaches that "show the love"
2) Facilities
3) Winning bowls/championships
Great points. I dug a little deeper into the USA Today database. MT spends roughly 3 million more on scholarships and 2 million more on "other" while WKU spends 2 million more on facilities.Do we need to donate more money, or are we just not spending this money wisely?
You mention WKU's and Marshall's facility investments, yet we spend more on athletics than they do.
http://sports.usatoday.com/ncaa/finances/
UAB spends a grand total of $41k more than us. And they got a $$$$'s bump from their very unique circumstance of shutting down and then having the community rally around them. They were traditionally a budget school.
How are our facilities and infrastructure so woefully inadequate yet schools that make the same or less money have all these wonderful, shiny new toys?
They're not richer than we are. So where does our money go?
Great points. I dug a little deeper into the USA Today database. MT spends roughly 3 million more on scholarships and 2 million more on "other" while WKU spends 2 million more on facilities.
My guess is that WKU's decision to suspend swimming / diving in (in the wake of the hazing incident) and men's tennis program gives them the ability to spend more on facilities.
One could argue the desire to be good at everything (win the all conference trophy) and desire to keep non-revenue sports prevents MT from being great in a major program (i.e. jack of all trades and a master of none).
Despite Murfreesboro's growth (both in population and industry), the lack of local support is, and should be, disturbing. As one poster said earlier, Massaro was probably shocked at the lack of local support for the athletic program. As a comparison, WKU (located in a town half the size of Murfreesboro) has more revenue coming from ticket sales and contributions than MT does
So many of your are so far gone you should just give it all a rest. I get the frustration, but if we suck this bad either do something different (like give more money) or go be a fan of a P5.
Coming on the boards and proclaiming how pathetic we are over and over and over is so old.
What is wrong with comparing ourselves to our peers and analyzing our shortcomings as a program? Everyone here cares about the program otherwise they wouldn't waste their time on this board. You can't just stick your hand in the sand and ignore our problems.
I'm going to defend Massaro while at the same time wishing he had gotten the Ga. St. job. (perhaps new blood could help somewhat)
I have gotta believe that Massaro's biggest surprise was the inability of a school our size to get financial support from area businesses, media, and yes: Alumni and locals. Over time his frustration probably caused him to see his job as being just one of "lifestyle maintenance". No ability to go elsewhere through success and no motivation by the excitement, only disappointment.
The arrival of pro-sports to the area and the ESPNing of sports fans, along with the minor impact of two local NAIA schools "moving up" severely hampered any attempts to become a major player in the mid-state. The three biggest companies in the county (State Farm possibly excepted) give very little to MT while spending millions in sports advertising elsewhere. And look at the mid-state south of Rutherford Co. Name one business other than a few car dealerships outside of Rutherford Co. that gives (or would be able to) to MT. Williamson and Wilson are too tied to Nashville. Nowhere to go in Marshall, Maury, Hickman, Lawrence, Franklin, Lincoln, Giles, Grundy, Cannon, Coffee, etc. for a donor to give even part of the support needed. You get the message.
The loss of expected income from the conference is huge also and subject of a different discussion.
No one is more disappointed that we are where we are 20 years into D-1 FB than me. I would have thought that by now we would have been supported throughout the mid-state similarly as the school up east is across the state. Not even close, perhaps even further away than decades ago. From the outside looking in I can understand the frustration for the incredibly slow facility upgrades and project announcements from young fans and those who aren't realists..
Fans, it is what it is. No dollars to promote, advertise, build, or improve. We are stuck in athletic purgatory. Not saying we would have been better staying in the OVC, but . . .
I see your point and I think there is some validity to those arguments, but I would say that is where a GOOD AD would come in. He is the AD for a reason, to bring the program along and set the direction. If you aren't getting any traction on donations, then evaluate what is working and what is not. Change things and push ahead to build a better program. You can't just sit there and accept that there is no money coming in and we are stuck. Don't just accept it for that fact, unless you are content being 6-6 every year and seeing more of the same. But guess what - the rest of the conference is moving forward, so unless we do we will fall behind. He's had long enough to build this thing up and I just don't see him moving the needle enough. He's got a lot to work with here (alumni, proximity to a large market, etc.)
Do we see any bigger programs trying to take Massaro from us? Does he even get a sniff? That's usually a good sign he is doing something right if other programs are trying to lure him away. To be approached by GA State? That doesn't really make me think he is in high regards in the AD world.
I'm thinking the AD position is one that needs new blood.
BEcause we havent offered them.And something else - you guys know I follow UT, as an alum of both schools. Well, they're a full on dumpster fire. Virtually the entirety of Butch Jones class has abandoned ship.
While these guys might not have been high major SEC caliber, a lot of them are now considering lower level P5 schools and G5 schools - as a G5 watcher, I tend to keep up with them. You'd be shocked at how many of them are considering WKU, Marshall, USM, FAU, etc. Maybe they end up there, maybe they don't (probably not, they'll end up at Rutgers and Indiana's of the world).
But not a single one has mentioned MTSU in any interviews. Why not?
Who are we signing?
Linebackers from California JUCOs whose only other offers are NAIA schools.
This x1000.You want the Alumni to pump in more money. Get a President that is amiable to the point where one wants to give. Many out there that will not give until he is gone. Just sayin. I hope the new board finally realizes this.
What is wrong with comparing ourselves to our peers and analyzing our shortcomings as a program? Everyone here cares about the program otherwise they wouldn't waste their time on this board. You can't just stick your hand in the sand and ignore our problems.
I think you misunderstand me...I am asking for action from the fans. If you don't like the direction then influence it. What is frustrating to me is folks come on the board and whine and say they are done until something changes. If you don't like our President then influence a change. If you don't like our coach or his contract then find a way to do what you think is best. We just won a bowl game and folks are not only not happy but talking negatively about it. Just take some action is all I am asking.
I think you misunderstand me...I am asking for action from the fans. If you don't like the direction then influence it. What is frustrating to me is folks come on the board and whine and say they are done until something changes. If you don't like our President then influence a change. If you don't like our coach or his contract then find a way to do what you think is best. We just won a bowl game and folks are not only not happy but talking negatively about it. Just take some action is all I am asking.