Originally posted by nashvillegoldenflash:
BBJ, I read the following post on another board and thought that I would share it with you.
These types of voting (mid-term elections) only indicate, imho, the fraud in voting. How can Kasich win easily, but Ohio go 52-48 for Obama twice. It makes no sense, at all. A supposed blue collar democratic state electing a conservative Governor. Same goes with any democratic bent state in Presidential elections that has a Republican Senator or Governor. Makes no sense, unless there is fraud, abundant fraud, at the national level and not so at state levels. I believe that whole heartedly. I don't care that voter turnout is higher amongst democrats in Presidential election cycles. Okay, so what. Is it THAT much higher in these swing states to cause that much of a difference between a Presidential race and a state race? I believe this early voting for POTUS is the key. It's a huge number, 42 million votes. I can remember watching the election for 2012, knowing Romney had actually pulled even or pretty close in the polling, and since the polling is so skewed democratically that it translated to a pretty easy Romney win. And you had an incumbent who had failed miserably. With all these indicators in place, it looked like Reagan/Carter all over again. And then as the results were coming in and you were seeing Romney gaining in Ohio, in Florida, in Virginia - in all these swing states - as if he was going to win, and then bam it just shifted in the oddest, weirdest way, just unnaturally. It was really odd, because late momentum in swing states means that it's getting close and the momentum is shifting, and always does shift. This time the shift not only stopped, but went the other way. I believe those votes from the early voting were used as they were needed, in all the swing states, through massive fraud. Because it makes no sense when senatorial or governorship races go the conservative direction in these swing states, you'd think the direction they would go would be the POTUS direction. But they don't often. So I am led to believe that the fraud that exists nationally does not exist at state levels. When it does trickle down to the state levels, it will not be good for the separation of powers. The fraud that exists nationally from the early votes will not bode well for half the country in 2016. If they pulled it off with the worst POTUS and worst incumbent POTUS in our history, they could pull it off for anyone from the democratic side. After these 8 years are over, who in their right mind would ever vote for Hillary Clinton, besides a base of freeloaders and loons of 40% in this country. She's a mirror of Obama, she worked with him for 4 years. But those 40 million plus early votes, without any fraud prevention, would be used again for the same rigging of state POTUS votes. Meaning California has 5 million of those early votes, 3 million are democratic, they are not needed in that state because it's a landslide win any way, so you conveniently shift them to Ohio, or Florida or wherever needed to swing the tide. Far-fetched? After watching the corruption, immorality, illegality, and complete unethical behavior of this administration the last 6 years, I have no doubt this happened and will happen again.
This post was edited on 10/16 7:28 PM by nashvillegoldenflash
